• SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Because just giving them money, no strings attached, is proven to be more effective AND more efficient in both money and manpower. Every single time it’s studied.

      The argument ‘But what if someone abuses it?’ always falls flat when countered by ‘What if people are unjustly denied support they need because of the restrictions?’ Because the first will always happen, no matter what, and the second only happens if you deny support. One person ‘unfairly’ wasting money on meth would be a more than fair price to pay for one more person getting what they need to survive, and if you believe otherwise… I don’t know what to tell you. Maybe go grow some human empathy.

      Besides, tax money is wasted WAY more by the rich than by the poor.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      no, wait, you’re onto something

      we could do that, and call it a first world level of healthcare or something, and ensure that everybody has access to the care that they need to live a good life

        • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          UBI doesn’t exist anywhere nationwide (except for the elderly), minimum income guarantees however have been implemented in many countries. For example, in my home country the minimum allowed income for a legal resident in a single-person household is just over 1900 USD per month. Meaning: if your income is below this, you have a right to supplemental income from the government.