• Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    slow clap and the last horse finally crosses the finish line.

    Too bad the rest of us have already been gluesticked.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      and then have to spend it in countries that are "tax-billionaire friendly’ which is going to slowly diminishing if they all become authoritarian in nature, eventually authotarians will be the only one that is the billionaire.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You’d think they’d listen to themselves jibber jabber.

    How about less stockholder and more customer.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I tend to not go to any chain restaurants at all anymore. I have one exception for the local bar that has super cheap prices and good food. otherwise, I go to privately owned restaurants and bars

    who the fuck wants to pay $9 for a beer at Kelsey’s where you can get ignored by your server for 20 minutes when trying to get the bill that shows you paid $25 for bland food, then be expected to tip the person already making a bit more than minimum wage $10 for the literally 2.5 minutes of service they gave you. no thanks

  • matlag@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The obvious solution is to tighten the wages to claw back profits despite the declining sales volume!

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Lol they aren’t concerned with people “running out of money” they’re concerned nobody will buy their products. Which could be solved by giving people more money but that’s not an option for them.

    Klarna and 8 year car loans are just the beginning. Trump was serious when he said we should do 100 year mortgages, THAT is the solution they are looking for. Not, “how can we get people more money to buy things”. But more “how can we get people with no money to continue buying things”.

  • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Oh waaa 🎻

    The nerve of these companies and CEOs complaining… They were warned about this a long time ago.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I have yet to read or hear of one CEO who ever deserved a godawfully huge bonus, but they do stick together those cunning rats. While it is true that most citizens have been “capitalized” out of even the spare nickels and dimes they had kicking around, the best the CEO can do is say “Our customers don’t have any money”, not why they don’t have any money. Fuck those big bonuses. The market is wild and out of control and has been forever so what exactly are those bonuses for…fluke profit?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      even Soros says alot of things that are pretty pro-billionaire and just rubs people the wrong way. hes what you would get if GATES isnt associated with EPSTEIN or his ruthlessness in MS.

  • rozodru@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    20 hours ago

    None of these fuckers think long term. it’s all quarter by quarter. I see it in my job even with startups. Build something now, use AI, it works now? great. it won’t scale a year or two down the line? that’s a problem for future me.

    Are we making money now? great. what do you mean a year or two down the line there will be no one left that makes enough money to buy our shit? that’s a problem for future me.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The last corporate job I had before going into business myself, was as a sales manager for a Fortune 100 company.

      It was very common at the end of a quarter to have to call around to wholesale customers, and beg them to take a pallette of some poorly selling sku, telling them “Don’t even unwrap it. Just stick it in a corner of the warehouse, and when the quarter turns, I’ll authorize a return of the inventory, and give you a discount on something else to make up for the trouble.”

      Did it all the time.

      • Freeposity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I made a ton of money building reporting systems which made it simple to identify this form of gaming sales numbers to fit targets.

        Thank you.

            • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Yeah, it went all the way to the top. Those guys wanted it done. It wasn’t the top brass we were fooling, it was the stock holders, who were reacting to quarterly numbers that were essentially faked.

    • 4grams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah, my company is chasing an IPO and so is slashing wages. People are leaving in droves, but since it makes number go up…

      No care whatsoever about post IPO. It’s going to be awful.

        • 4grams@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I have an interview next week, I can’t risk it just yet. Plus it’s mostly internal speculation as nothing but the salary reductions have been announced.

        • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          IPO: initial public offering. Means when a private business goes public (and is therefore able to be traded on the stock market). The CEO loses a lot of their stock during the process, so it’s in the CEO’s best interest to rugpull as hard as possible during an IPO so that they can cash out.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            thats what spez did with REDDIT, he made hundreds of millions as soon IPO happened, now he needs to keep afloat long enough to be an entrenched propaganda machine, while still earning from advertisements, or funding by propaganda groups.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “I’ll just make a well timed bet on my company declaring bankruptcy right before we release a dumpster fire earnings report and ride off into the sunset. I’m a good person who makes the world a better place, my child’s little league coach told me so when I took my turn buying pizza for the team.”

  • Sushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    164
    ·
    1 day ago

    From my brief skim of the article it seems like they’re worried that poor people not being able to afford anything will mean less profits for big businesses.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      101
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you think they’ll ever realize that there are so many poor people that can’t afford anything anymore because those same companies have spent 60+ years ensuring wages stay exactly where they were while prices increased?

      I doubt it. It’s clear that to be a CEO you need to have zero problem solving skills, just social connections and rich parents (usually). It’s the rest of the management team below the C-Suite that has does the thinking. Then middle manglement fucks up implementing it to try and get noticed for a promotion from their dead-end position because they aren’t a part of the rich club already.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        besides tech, most other stem jobs are pretty stagnant and low to begin with. yea trades might good for some people, that arnt prone to physical ailements but it seems its much more geared towards white people instead, plus the conservative culture of the industry. in construction is quite uncommon to see an asian person working there.

      • fartographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        If I’m correctly reading into the history and motivations of corporations, this is part of them donning their hot dog suit and saying that they’re trying to figure out why everyone is mysteriously poor.

        After that, they’ll put on a ROCK/BAND shirt, a backwards hat, and carry a skateboard before explaining that this “poor” is hitting everyone the same. And they’ll lay off thousands or millions more than they already have

        Then…
        money_please.gif

        After proving once again that they’re the “job makers,” they’ll get their emergency loans, buy out weaker competition, and everyone will accuse them of foul play.

        Finally, they’ll hire everyone back at fractions of their previous pay, even though the cost of living will have disproportionately risen as well. People will fight, there will be strikes, and then the bleed will be slowed, but not stopped, by the companies “giving in to demands” that are actually neutered facsimiles of the original bargaining proposals. But everyone will be too tired and poor to continue fighting. We’ll all ask our politicians how this could have happened and why they still trust the corporations. Then we get to watch the old song and dance all over again:

        iveneverdoneanythingwrongeverinmylife.gif
        iknowthisandiloveyou.gif
        money_please(1).gif

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Thats not what’s going on.

        Retailers have commissioned surveys to determine that people are already out of money.

        They use this to create a narrative and promote the idea that additional interest rate rises are unnecessary because people are already broke to additional interest rate hikes will just create a recession.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        those same companies have spent 60+ years ensuring wages stay exactly where they were while prices increased?

        This is not true.

        Wages in the US adjusted for prices have generally been going up - but slowly - even since Reagan. This remains true - broadly - even if you look at the lowest income decile, but the growth is less:

        image

        So wages were stagnant for the bottom decile from 1980 to 2016, but rose since then. It is, however, not even correct to say that “wages stayed the same but prices went up” between 1980 and 2016, because those are inflation-adjusted figures: the price increases are already factored in.