• floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Origin” is a peculiar choice for a version name. I wonder if they’re trying to go off of the popularity of a common extension

  • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    306
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yet people keep recommending products by this scummy company and pile on Firefox for slightest missteps.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      168
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Mozilla should be scrutinized, even if Firefox is currently the best option.

      I think the only thing keeping them inline is loud community backlash everytime they make one of those misssteps.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        People dont seem to be scrutinizing though. Its genuinely unhinged and often completely misinformed. They will jump on a single line of a legal text and use it to springboard into a world of scenarios even when Mozilla is saying its not true.

        It doesnt help improve the product it just makes people think all products are bad and fallback to whatever the comfortable majority is which is chrome.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sometimes corporations lie.

          It’s not being unhinged to say you don’t like something. And the way that Mozilla is embracing “AI” is not welcomed.

        • FluorideMind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Who cares it’s a corporation, it doesn’t have feelings. Anything to keep these corpos in line.

      • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think everyone should be held to the same standard. We can yell at Firefox a bit less. We should yell at Brave a lot more.

      • zewm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sorry man, but the minute Firefox added that keylogger, I dipped.

        Firefox rendering engine is dogshit and they are massively behind.

        This coming from someone that was using Netscape and Mozilla and Firefox since its release.

        • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Firefox doesn’t include a keylogger. It does have the infamous privacy preserving attribution but this can easily be disabled in settings.

          In contrast, Chrome is literally a tool for Google to gain as much personal information as possible for Googles advertisement platform. It has the worst privacy features of the three major browsers and cannot be fully made private due to crippled extension support.

          Firefox engine has some catching up to do, but the Safari rendering engine is behind Firefox on features.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I find LibreWolf to be the better option for privacy, I never have an issue with rendering.

        • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t know what you’re on about. There is no keylogger and I don’t have any issues with the engine unless it’s some weird ass “chrome experiments” style website which I couldn’t care less about.

        • Liana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          You either die a Netscape Navigator, or you live long enough to become a… any of em, really.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      They removed the paw, they are worse than Chrome! I’m going to use an alternative version that cannot exist without the main project to teach them a lesson!

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Alternatives being even worse doesn’t make firefox good, or invalidate any objective criticism against it.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      this is a new browser and i have no idea why anyone would want to use it

      because Brave is unchanged and still the best browser in the world right now

      WOOOO!

    • artyom@piefed.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      3 days ago

      All of the current browsers have major drawbacks. Brave has many features that other browsers don’t offer. They’ve made what is quickly becoming the industry standard adblocker, being adopted by Firefox, Waterfox, Comet, and even Ladybird browser. No extensions required.

      Most browsers don’t allow you to easily toggle on and off certain privacy features on a per-site basis. That’s why I use it primarily.

      Origin is free on Linux.

      Until Servo and Ladybird are ready, this strikes the best balance for privacy and usabllity, in my opinion

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Brave has many features that other browsers don’t offer

        Such as? Crypto nonsense?

        The adblocker? OK I guess, except they are still just a middle man for ads (hence the crypto nonsense).

        I dont see the value.

      • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Most browsers don’t allow you to easily toggle on and off certain privacy features on a per-site basis

        I don’t know what “certain features” are. LibreWolf lets me easily enable WebGL on per-site basis and uBlock could always do that anyway. I don’t need to touch anything else.

        Origin is free on Linux.

        Yes, and you can also toggle everything off via config. That does not matter, it’s still a scummy move that should be ridiculed. How, exactly, is a dashboard that toggles some settings on or off is worth 60 dollars? It’s not “paying for convenience” it’s a tax on tech incompetency.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t know what “certain features” are.

          Would you like to know or were just just wanting to be contrarian?

          How, exactly, is a dashboard that toggles some settings on or off is worth 60 dollars?

          It’s not. And its not supposed to be. Its to fund the development of the browser.

          • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s not. And its not supposed to be. Its to fund the development of the browser.

            “Deal with worse UX or pay us to develop more crap” is not a good way to entice “voluntary” donations. Though I guess they know their audience is full of copium anyway, maybe it is an effective way at least, we’ll see.

            Would you like to know or were just just wanting to be contrarian?

            Funny you should say that, usually when I check tech threads - somehow you’re always there being downvoted to all hell for writing something edgy in a very pedantic (i.e. obnoxious) way. Including this thread. You could have just listed the damn features twice already when prompted about them, but you’re actively choosing to continue bullshitting as though you’re on twitter and farming for clout. I think I’ll just block you now.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              “Deal with worse UX or pay us to develop more crap” is not a good way to entice “voluntary” donations.

              That’s okay because that’s not what’s happening, as I’ve already explained. It is a purchase, not a donation. It’s not a novel approach, many other beloved FOSS software take a similar approach to secure funding. Off the top of my head, Zorin OS, Immich, OSMAnd, OnlyOffice, Cryptpad, etc.

              You could have just listed the damn features twice already when prompted about them

              I was never prompted. You could have just asked. But I think it’s abundantly clear at this point that you just don’t want to know.

              Thank you for blocking me, I appreciate it.

      • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m curious how their adblocker blocks more than 100% of all ads, cuz that’s what they’d need to beat ublock (which existed before brave did).

        • naeap@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          To be fair, he said something about built-in
          But I’m with you
          The choice of high quality ad Blockers per addon is nothing that’s wrong with Firefox

    • kepix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      won so much uninstall when it showed a world cup advert to everyones face the other day. the forks are great, but the fox is getting enshitificated in every possible way.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          3 days ago

          On the mobile app, when you open it there’s a non-removable FIFA widget in the home page. I hate it.

          Edit: I’ve tried again and now they added an option to remove it. But still, why would I want a fucking soccer widget in my browser?

          • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah it’s doing that to me too. The ‘Countdown to the world cup’ thing? Fuck the world cup, fuck these ads, I’m only still using Firefox because I can’t be bothered to migrate all my bookmarks to something better.

            • Scrollone@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Exactly, and the world cup of soccer is managed by FIFA, one of the most evil organisations in the world.

              Firefox is a beautiful product managed by a retarded company. Mozilla should die and just become a non-profit.

              • Someone8765210932@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                FIFA, one of the most evil organisations in the world

                Sorry, but no matter how bad and corrupt FIFA is, calling them that is ridiculous. Your average American health care/insurance company and their “deny, defend, depose” operation is probably worse.

            • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              What would be better though?
              I have my problems with mozilla, but between apple, google and mozilla, they absolutely win in my book.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I also use a fork on most systems, but I still use Firefox pretty often, and I can think of a lot more ways it could be worse and isn’t being enshittified.

  • kibblebits@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Brave has always been a joke. And Brave users will always be a joke. And anyone who’s ever simped for Brave will always be a moron.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Rude. But not inaccurate. Brave pretends to be better than Chrome and Google, but also Mozilla and Firefox at the same time, though Firefox has always done it better and has never contributed to the chromium monopoly. Greed over diversification of the Web and competition between browser engines to effect real change. The least Brave could do is make their own engine.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      when do you think brave will overtake firefox in share worldwide?

      1 year, 2?

      lol

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Eh, I use it for watching youtube.

      For some reason (likely youtube fighting my adblockers) I get tons of errors and issues with youtube on firefox. But Brave works alright, and also blocks the ads. So it’s my dedicated youtube browser.

      • Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        never had issues with firefox and ublock origin and youtube and whatever and neither on android, linux, windows or whatsoever. guess i am just not dumb enough

        • dbtng@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Gotta refresh em sometimes. When ublock stops managing youtube perfectly, I reload all the filters. Sometimes I don’t even need to close out the browser, just the filters.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I feel like if you’re writing the sentence “an optional, paid version of our browser that offers Brave […] without its extra features,” you need to sit back and take a long, hard look at yourself.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 days ago

    The bad news is, if you’re not on Team Tux, you’re going to have to pay $60 for Brave Origin. Granted, you only need to buy it once, and you’ll get unlimited activations across all of your devices.

    It’s amazing people still believe this BS.

    • Liana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’ll probably hold to it for that exact product. If they rebrand it and add it back, that’s no longer the same thing you paid for ;)

      • dbtng@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ya, that’s the really obvious take. That’s teh way you do biz these days.
        Like, that’s what’s gonna happen to all those ‘lifetime’ Plex accounts. Sure, you still have access to ‘Plex-classic’. But you don’t get any of the new Plextastic services … unless you want to pay the $1,999 upgrade fee …

        • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          If I get to use the exact product I paid for a lifetime account for forever that does kinda sound like exactly what I paid for.

          • dbtng@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Trust me. You need Plextastic. Its got all the cool new stuff. Just a small fee.
            You will come around.

    • dbtng@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Totally off topic, but I drink at a bar called Spaghetti Western!
      Hillsboro, OR.