Gonzako@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoIts all the phone and communists faultlemmy.worldimagemessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageIts all the phone and communists faultlemmy.worldGonzako@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squarebearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoEnsuring that everyone has access to food, water, healthcare, education and shelter is objectively good. Do you disagree?
minus-squarebearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 months ago@OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world - What do you think, buddy? Do you disagree with this too?
minus-squareOriginEnergySux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoI think it’s objectively efficient, but not objectively “good”
minus-squarebearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoWouldn’t you prefer to live in a society without homelessness, for example? You don’t think that would be a better society than our current one?
minus-squareOriginEnergySux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoMy disagreement was with the wording of “good”, that’s all.
minus-squarebearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 months agoSo you would prefer to live in a society without homelessness, but you wouldn’t say that it would be “good” to create a society without homelessness, is that right? Just trying to understand.
Ensuring that everyone has access to food, water, healthcare, education and shelter is objectively good. Do you disagree?
@OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world - What do you think, buddy? Do you disagree with this too?
I think it’s objectively efficient, but not objectively “good”
Wouldn’t you prefer to live in a society without homelessness, for example? You don’t think that would be a better society than our current one?
My disagreement was with the wording of “good”, that’s all.
So you would prefer to live in a society without homelessness, but you wouldn’t say that it would be “good” to create a society without homelessness, is that right? Just trying to understand.