Gonzako@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoIts all the phone and communists faultlemmy.worldimagemessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageIts all the phone and communists faultlemmy.worldGonzako@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squareOriginEnergySux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoI think it’s objectively efficient, but not objectively “good”
minus-squarebearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoWouldn’t you prefer to live in a society without homelessness, for example? You don’t think that would be a better society than our current one?
minus-squareOriginEnergySux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoMy disagreement was with the wording of “good”, that’s all.
minus-squarebearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month agoSo you would prefer to live in a society without homelessness, but you wouldn’t say that it would be “good” to create a society without homelessness, is that right? Just trying to understand.
I think it’s objectively efficient, but not objectively “good”
Wouldn’t you prefer to live in a society without homelessness, for example? You don’t think that would be a better society than our current one?
My disagreement was with the wording of “good”, that’s all.
So you would prefer to live in a society without homelessness, but you wouldn’t say that it would be “good” to create a society without homelessness, is that right? Just trying to understand.