

There’s a limit to it though.
Biking is great for cities, unless you’d have to cross most of it to reach work, hospitals, or healthy foods and bring them home. I’ve known people that did it, but I don’t think most of the country could qualify as a paradise, even if we tore down and rebuilt cities from the ground up.
Plus, it doesn’t address the needs of those that can’t bike, or maybe even not walk. The elderly, the disabled, the temporarily sick, and even kids considering the way the world has gotten populated ( bigger numbers mean the percentage of predators also returns bigger numbers of those).
And it really only works in some cities, and would require shifting all of the shipping to retail connections. You can’t get supplies from a train to a warehouse on pedal power realistically, nor from warehouse to citizen available stations like stores.
Unless you’re suggesting a total death of modern civilization. Which is cool, but not at all going to happen. Because without the supply infrastructure that gets materials from suppliers to where the goods need to be, they can’t get there. Even if we went back to horses and carriages for that, we’d still need well built roads that connect things. Doing that leaves biking in the same category it does with cars, so the only improvement is in not having to suck exhaust. Which would be great, just not sure it’s a realistic thing









I asked a lawyer this once. After he was done laughing, the gist was that the limits of anonymity for witnesses is damn near zero. There’s circumstances where a witness might be given some cover if they’re minors, adults just don’t get that. That’s the US though, there are places where secret or anonymous testimony is used.
Now, the conversation did include some hypotheticals. He said there could be some arguments akin to what some vulnerable populations occasionally get, or when a witness is in immediate and provable danger. Anonymous testimony as a last resort is possible, just so rarely given as to be laughable in his opinion.
The big factor in why it wouldn’t work for a vigilante is that even when anonymous testimony is allowed, it’s really only anonymous to the courtroom. The judge would have to know who it was, and likely multiple people involved in the process of trying to get the judge to go along with it.
Even then, a U.S. based prosecutor would be desperate to even consider trying in the first place. Anonymous testimony would be easy to counter, and there would be a ton of ways to counter the attempt in the first place.
What I was told is that it would be career suicide to try and fail. And the chances of success for an adult vigilante are essentially zero when the difficulty of making it happen under very rare circumstances for kids or known adults is already difficult.
There would need to be legislation in place for it to happen in the real world in most countries. I did a quick search on other places, and it’s still rare even in places where secret testimony is less rare than the US. Even those places, the identity is known to the state.