favoredponcho@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoCoding After Coders: The End of Computer Programming as We Know Itwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10 cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkCoding After Coders: The End of Computer Programming as We Know Itwww.nytimes.comfavoredponcho@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square16linkfedilink cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoAs in: you agree with the article’s assertion?
minus-squarefavoredponcho@lemmy.zipOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 days agoI don’t write code anymore. No one I work with does either.
minus-squareEm Adespoton@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 days agoI work with a lot of productive software developers. They all write code. They also leverage AI to do all the boring stuff.
minus-squarefavoredponcho@lemmy.zipOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·7 days agoThey’re wasting time cause the AI can also do the non-boring stuff.
minus-squareEm Adespoton@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoTrust me… it’s getting better, but it can’t do the non-boring stuff in a way that’s ISO compliant. Yet.
minus-squareBassTurd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 days agoSure, for basic projects if you don’t value security or efficiency.
As in: you agree with the article’s assertion?
I don’t write code anymore. No one I work with does either.
I work with a lot of productive software developers. They all write code. They also leverage AI to do all the boring stuff.
They’re wasting time cause the AI can also do the non-boring stuff.
Trust me… it’s getting better, but it can’t do the non-boring stuff in a way that’s ISO compliant. Yet.
Sure, for basic projects if you don’t value security or efficiency.
Or long term maintainability.