Donald Trump on Tuesday told CNBC that he will gratefully “remember” U.S. companies that do not seek refunds for the tariffs he unilaterally imposed, which the Supreme Court later ruled were illegal.

Trump’s comment on “Squawk Box” came a day after U.S. Customs and Border Protection opened a portal for importers to seek more than $160 billion in potential refunds for the so-called IEEPA tariffs.

He was asked about a number of large companies, among them Apple and Amazon, that have not filed requests for refunds for the tariffs they paid, potentially because they are worried about “offending” Trump.

  • Rusticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 hours ago

    With any luck American voters will also remember, since they are the ones who paid for the fucking things.

    • BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Came here to say this. But then realised it wouldn’t matter because he would just lie about it if asked anyway 😂 “I had breakfast, it was the best breakfast. It broke records for how fast and everyone complimented me about it.”

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would immediately ask him what he had for breakfast yesterday if he said that to me.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    171
    ·
    2 days ago

    The tariffs WE PAID. Those fucking companies jacked up prices to cover them. Now our tax money is going to pay them again.

      • Janx@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, there’s no chance they now lower prices and collect less profit. That’s what we should remember…

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Taxes this year were brutal. Fucking. Goddamn. Brutal.

      Trump is suing our own government to steal these. He’s doing it right now. He’s a fucking traitor.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think I’m with the companies here, which feels weird to say. The Trump admin imposed these ridiculous tariffs, which the companies had to pay. Makes no sense for them to lose money on the products they sell, so of course they raised prices, which we all said they would have to when the tariffs were imposed. Meanwhile, the administration pocketed the money. Then the tariffs were ruled to have been illegal.

      So yes, I want the companies to go after the money that the administration illegally bilked them (and, indirectly, us) out of. I hope they figure out ways to pass the recovered money back to customers; Costco has said it will use the money to lower prices. But it’s actually more important to me that the administration not get away with the illegal tariffs.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Meanwhile, the administration pocketed the money.

        I mean, sort of, but not really. The money went into the Federal budget, and even if some of it did get embezzled by Trump cronies, the money that comes back isn’t going to come back out of their pockets.

        If the embezzlement happened, that’s a separate, additional crime on top of issuing the illegal tariffs themselves.

        But it’s actually more important to me that the administration not get away with the illegal tariffs.

        Then the only correct solution is prison (or worse) for the officials involved. Making the Federal government (i.e., we, the people) pay back the illegal tariffs does fuck-all to punish the corrupt officials responsible.

        I’m not saying the illegal tariffs shouldn’t be refunded, I’m just saying it isn’t the punishment you’re looking for.

        (Oh, by the way: the next step in your recap of the situation is going to be “the Federal government raises taxes to cover the ‘shortfall’ caused by refunding the illegal tariffs.” I haven’t heard anything about it yet, but you’ll see. We, the people will be left holding the bag again.)

        • I’m with you on prison.

          I understand that our taxes will go up. This administration is screwing the vast majority of the American people. Only the wealthy are benefiting.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        Product sells for $10. After tariffs of $2 it sells for $14.

        You pay $2 tariff and $2 convenient price hike. Company makes $2 for hiking price more than value of tariff.

        Company requests refund for $2, company made $4 total.

        You paid $4 extra total, which the company made. It’s a completely standard transaction, money from your packet to company’s. And more tax money will be wasted for the costs of processing the refunds.

        Company brings price down to $12, you’re still overpaying, and are you necessarily buying that product again?

        • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m sure some companies did that, but do you have data suggesting that was a widespread practice? Because what I read was that lots and lots of companies tried to stock up on materials before the tariffs went into effect, so they wouldn’t have to raise prices, and then many just ate the extra cost for a while - hoping the tariffs would be short lived - because they knew they would lose customers, before ultimately raising prices to cover. Many companies did lose money on the deal, according to what was reported.

          But I’ll read whatever you have from a reputable source.

  • magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just like he remembers the Afghans that helped fight with US soldiers now at risk of being deported to the Congo?

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not as much “remember” as if a company wants a favor from him, they can point out they didn’t seek tariff refunds and he MIGHT do it.