• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    It installed it two years ago but nobody noticed because all the privacy nerds use different browsers

  • motruck@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Google doesn’t need to scrape the web they just need chrome to send them the das you are already scrapping for them. Stop using Chrome.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Omg but it’s ok because we called it 🌼⭐ federated learning ✨💮 so we only steal the data that is profitable to us while legally no PII leaves your device 🚀 weeeee!

  • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just the other day I uninstalled Chrome & gave “Enshittification” as the reason when prompted. Not that I’d been using it since turning to Firefox a few years ago and Waterfox more recently.

  • tomjuggler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I found out this doesn’t apply to celeron laptop from 2016 with 4 GB ram so all good.

    Local AI js API checks pc specs before downloading - cos it wouldn’t work anyway 😁

  • wraekscadu@vargar.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s all a joke at this point lol.

    “So what new evil schemes are big tech up to? Ah, installing LLMs on people’s devices? Wonderful!”

    • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Maybe one of their users will find a use for it.Then they will finally have a business plan!

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I only used Chrome on my old phone, and since I have switched away from it with the new phone.

    No sensible adblocker is the point that killed Chrome for me.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It’s always funny seeing the recent Reddit migrants here. Brave did a massive astroturfing ad campaign on Reddit for a while, and it was hugely successful. After things reached a critical mass, the echo chamber took over and Reddit users naturally began pushing Brave’s marketing fluff to the top. Brave is wildly popular over on Reddit as a result.

      But they never targeted Lemmy, and Lemmings were pretty quick to jump on the “Brave is run by a very problematic person, and has a problematic past” side of things. Lemmy also has a very vocal FOSS enthusiast crowd, because the idea of FOSS meshes very well with why people would land on Lemmy. So Lemmings tend to prefer Firefox forks instead.

      But you can always tell when someone has recently migrated here from Reddit. Because they’ll post a comment praising Brave, expecting to get upvoted like they would on Reddit. And instead, they get buried in downvotes and “my specific fork of Firefox is better” comments.

      And sure enough, OP’s account is less than a day old, so they’re most likely a recent Reddit migrant.

      OP, to address your point, Brave is still a Chromium browser, and has all of the trappings that entails. It is also run by a dude with a problematic past, and the company as a whole has a problematic past too. You should consider switching to a Firefox fork instead, with uBlock Origins or AdNauseum (which is a uBO fork) as ad blockers. I personally suggest the WaterFox fork, though you’ll likely want to disable some of the more strict privacy protections (like wiping all of your data every time you close the app) because it can make daily use a bit of a chore otherwise. There is always a matter of give-and-take between convenience and privacy, and WaterFox tends to skew more towards privacy.

      • Nyadia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think you’re mixing up Waterfox with Librewolf. Librewolf by default deletes all your data after closing it, Waterfox doesn’t.

        It’s actually for this reason that I use both for different purposes. I sign into accounts with Waterfox (using account containers and browser profiles so each account’s data is self-contained and not shared between each other) and use a sandboxed installation of Librewolf with a few extensions like NoScript installed and letterboxing enabled for anything I don’t sign into (i.e. news articles, web searches, etc.) so that the 50-odd domains running scripts on my local news station’s website get way less of a fingerprint off me to use to target ads at me or sell my data to data brokers or the gestapo.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Hah, you’re 100% correct. I use WaterFox as my daily driver, and remembered all of the frustrations with persistent data deletion from initially trying Librewolf. I swear WaterFox came with those features by default, but I probably transposed the frustration from when I initially tried out Librewolf instead.

  • ben@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    217
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well your first mistake was using Chrome in 2026

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      same i abandoned as soon as they said they were going to slow the browser/computer down for people using private mode. oh and it has no adblock that is good as ublock origin.

    • Björn@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I hate that I still have to use Chrome because it can do some streaming stuff better than Firefox (and even Chromium for some reason). I only use it to connect to one KVM.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        82
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Do the streaming issues resolve themselves ✨magically✨ when faking the user agent to be Chrome for those streaming sites, e.g. using Firefox and a user agent add-on?

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          7 days ago

          Many do, yes. Any time I get an error message like “You’re not using a supported browser” that message vanishes after adjusting the user agent.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 days ago

            Well yes, the warning messages will disappear as those are often shown or not shown based on user agent.

            But will the actual streaming issues go away is the big question.

            Teams on the web for example, worked fine in Firefox even though it warned the user it didn’t work in anything but Chrome.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 days ago

          My issues were with h265/HEVC support, proprietary stuff like media codecs can sometimes be a pain. I no longer have that need so I’m a happy fox.

          • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            Pretty sure Firefox added support for HEVC a while back, but it relies on the system to provide the decoder (Which you’ll usually have to pay extra for)

            Firefox also supports MKV files now, which is nice.

          • Madrigal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Tell them to get their shit together and support open-source browsers, or more accurately just browser standards in general.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          When I need to use Chrome, I just use the Chrome Mask extension in Firefox to change my user agent. I haven’t had a site that actually failed to work on the Gecko engine instead of Chromium. It’s just lazy devs checking your user agent to see if you’re using Chromium, and then throwing a fit if you’re not.

          Chrome Mask even has a built in site reporter, because broken sites don’t actually conform to modern web interoperability requirements. If it fails to work on Gecko, there’s a good chance that it will also fail to work on other platforms (like Apple’s WebKit) as well. And the reports go to the team that develops Firefox, so they can figure out why the site is refusing to work on Gecko.

        • matchaotter@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Vivaldi is a great Chromium browser. I’m more of a Firefox/Librewolf on my personal machines, but my work’s software has a few features that only work with Chromium extensions so I had to use it. Was my preferred alternative to all others, while bloated it was highly controllable and didn’t focus on unnecessary features like Brave or others. My work recently banned any browser that isn’t Chrome/Edge/Firefox though, so I guess I’m back to Firefox and will ignore the features I can’t use

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Try Brave for this use-case. I find that it works well for all kinds of streaming.

        And while it’s no Firefox or Librewolf, it’s still a lot better than Chrome.