Former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon, when asked to explain the apparent about-face that led him to advocate the unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, quoted a beloved Israeli pop ballad. “What you can see from there, you can’t see from here,” he said, referring to the shift in perspective he had supposedly undergone since coming to power.

Israeli-born Holocaust historian Omer Bartov invoked the same line when he was asked how he had come to view Israel’s ferocious assault on Gaza as a genocide. Living in the US, where he has spent more than three decades, he said, had given him the necessary distance to see the annihilation of Gaza for what it was. “I think it’s very hard to be dispassionate when you’re there,” he said.

Bartov did more than simply apply the word genocide to Israel’s actions: he shouted it from the establishment-media rooftops, making the case in a lengthy July 2025 essay in the New York Times titled: I’m a Genocide Scholar. I Know It When I See It. (He had addressed some of the arguments in a Guardian essay the year prior.) Bartov’s declaration cost him several close relationships, he told me, even though subsequent events have not only validated his analysis but further demonstrated the lack of concern for Palestinian suffering that has become prevalent in Israeli society.

His new book, Israel: What Went Wrong?, is an attempt to explain that indifference. The book, which was published on Tuesday, is a detailed account of how Israel was transformed from a hopeful nation that in its founding document promised “complete equality of social and political rights to all its citizens irrespective of religion, race or sex” into one intent on what he bluntly terms “settler colonialism and ethno-nationalism”.

  • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    How about we give the Palestinians their homeland back, and israel can be remade in america, since so many of the settlers have american passports, if we’re giving away any random country’s land to capitulate to this genocidal state?

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Delusional. Israel is not going anywhere. They’re a nuclear power, they’re a military power, they have a massive economy, they have 10 million people, and they can enforce their sovereignty. You can’t be taken seriously if you unironically think that Israel can be destroyed or that’s even a good idea (the current population there will just form another state that will be Israel 2.0).

      Reality has shifted, and fixating on what should’ve been will cost you the opportunity to get the best version of what you could get. The reality on the ground right now is that Israel is the sovereign country of the region, and the far right are trying to quickly erase the remnants left of what could be a Palestinian state. If that happens, and we’re quickly heading in that direction, then it’s over. There’s no conversation to be had anymore. However, we’re not there yet, and so it’s a lot more pragmatic and realistic to try hold on to what is left and use that as foundation for establishing an actual Palestinian state.

      • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        So you agree that the state of israel is a murderous one, and your solution is to give them the land of the people they murder with impugnity and celebrate the deaths of with champagne?

        • panthera_@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Read my proposal. Egypt would own the West Bank enlarged by land equivalent to the Gaza Strip, which would be given to Israel.

          • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I understand your proposal, but wholeheartedly reject it at its premise.

            It involves giving land that is historically Palestinian, to countries that are not Palestine.