Two bills moving through the California legislature this year could change how e-bikes are bought, ridden, and regulated across the state. One would require
Fair enough. Yeah if all e-bikes are going to be sharing the road with cars anyway, I can see why it wouldn’t make sense to limit unlicensed ones to 25 in your case. But at the same time, it makes sense that if a vehicle is capable of speeding, it should have a license plate on it and require the user to be 18. No?
Yes and a driver’s test, like any other licensed vehicle. What I would oppose are speed capping the vehicles themselves or outright banning them, as I think both of those “solutions” are more in service to the automotive industry than anything else. And throws the baby out with the bath water, so to speak.
Well, nobody’s outright banning them luckily, and only the ones that don’t require a test are being capped AFAIK. If your ebike is registered as a motorcycle, it requires a driver’s test and doesn’t need to have the speed capped at all.
Fair enough. Yeah if all e-bikes are going to be sharing the road with cars anyway, I can see why it wouldn’t make sense to limit unlicensed ones to 25 in your case. But at the same time, it makes sense that if a vehicle is capable of speeding, it should have a license plate on it and require the user to be 18. No?
Yes, if it can go over the speed limit I agree. However I cannot.
Yes and a driver’s test, like any other licensed vehicle. What I would oppose are speed capping the vehicles themselves or outright banning them, as I think both of those “solutions” are more in service to the automotive industry than anything else. And throws the baby out with the bath water, so to speak.
Well, nobody’s outright banning them luckily, and only the ones that don’t require a test are being capped AFAIK. If your ebike is registered as a motorcycle, it requires a driver’s test and doesn’t need to have the speed capped at all.