The first three runners were all faster than the previous world record.
So the third place finisher broke the previous world record, but the other two in front of him broke it even harder.
You’re taking this a little too literally. The point is you run a sub 2 marathon and only don’t get the record because someone broke the record literally 20 something seconds before you reached the line. That’s gotta hurt somehow
The first three runners were all faster than the previous world record.
So the third place finisher broke the previous world record, but the other two in front of him broke it even harder.
But how could he have made history if the other front runners already smashed that? This seems a little weird phrasing
You’re taking this a little too literally. The point is you run a sub 2 marathon and only don’t get the record because someone broke the record literally 20 something seconds before you reached the line. That’s gotta hurt somehow