By law, we had to make certain redactions.… But we said to Congress, any congressman can come in and spend as much time as they want looking at everything unredacted.

  • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    He is “acting AG”. Not even confirmed yet. The purpose of impeachment is to take an appointee from “confirmed” to “non-confirmed” status. I am not even sure impeachment would make sense? Couldn’t Trump just make him acting AG immediately again?

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      He’s the AG. This was a trick they pulled in the first term. You make a guy the “acting” head of the agency, and he does the job until the new guy gets appointed, and approved by the Senate.

      So what happens if you name an “acting” head, and then never choose a final appointee? Nothing. Nothing happens. Your chosen guy remains the head of the agency, without ever being vetted or approved by the Senate.

      Todd Flintstone is the new AG, for all ill tents and porpoises.