Make so sign up requires proof of work. Will slow them down.

Become computationally expensive for them at scale

US is also surveillance state

Slop is slop, AI slop < human slop.

All your doing is advertising how much you don’t respect your work or the work of others.

Code is the app, code is the functionality. If the code is crap then so is the functionality.

You’ve made a tool with a loose handle. And axe with a crack in they head. It’s gonna fly off and hurt someone.

Just because you are a crappy programmer doesn’t mean everyone else is.

There is nothing wrong with open source. Your opened source code just sucks.

Idk what to tell you besides to take a long critical look at yourself and your work.

If you can’t write manually and have it not be slop then you can’t program with a LLM effectively.

It doesn’t matter how much instruction you give a LLM it fundamentally cannot evaluate itself. Because to ensure that it’s evaluating correctly either you need to evaluate it or someone else. These are not deterministic machines and will “lie” to reach their goals. And I put that in quotes because it’s not really lying that’s to much personification.

These things are not good for literally anything beyond minor transformation or boilerplate.

Trust me. If you actually spend the time learning to code well written software by hand you will save time and get a better result. LLMs based coding is a anti-pattern.

You’re not getting push back because “programmers a upset their jobs are getting stolen” you’re getting push back because your falling for LLM company propaganda. LLMs just are not there yet.

If more then 20% of your code is written by a LLM your using it wrong.

I’ve read some other comments and wanted to add.

You cannot use a LLM to verify its own work

They have no ability to think. Any intelligence they have is extremely limited. There a mostly automatic copy and paste machines. They pull code from their training data and online and attempt to compose the.

Using a LLM to verify its own work is like asking a criminal to run their own trial.

That’s just now any of this works. I think you should take a step back from the LLM and really start evaluating your work more critically. There is more to software then “it works!”

look I’m all for using LLMs for tedious or straight forward transformations of easily verifiable logic. The issue is they LLMs are sycophantic by nature and we are seeing a lot of newly freed “geniuses” who have promised “no no no. You see! I know the secret to using them for good!”

It’s like the one ring. If you start using it for doing anything beyond reformating, anything that requires critical thinking, you’ve already trapped yourself.

You’ll feel like your work is quality when it isn’t.

Personally I still think the quality of LLM code is crap for pretty much anything. Much better done by a well seasoned developer, which is harder to come by then people think. A LLM can help in some narrow cases but not many.

Gunnar be honest. It’s not a good backup if this can possibly happen. Like LLMs agents are dangerous but if you can just delete everything in 9 seconds then you need to rethink your security practice. No one employee should have that much power.

It’s secure because it’s symmetric. It can’t be cracked because there is no exposed secondary information.

Asymmetrical encryption relies on using information which is visible to the outside world to compute two keys using math that is very difficult to reverse. Quantum computers make that math MUCH easier.

But since symmetric encryption doesn’t do that. It’s safe.

If laws are never enforced do they exist? Need to imprison people for white colar crimes or ban them from ever holding a position of power equivalent to their current.

Darn

Hey OP my family recently lost our cat and this looks A LOT like like him. You didn’t happen to find him in West Virginia in the US did you??

There’s gotta bee a good enough example set somewhere for research already

What if I train a generative AI on thousands of images of iris’s and start generating fake ones?

Ok is it actually reclassified or is he just saying it is. Last time I looked at the official legal documents it is still schedule 1

I actually really like this, and it won’t slide down your wrist or hug it too tight either

I’m getting deja Vu. I thought he said we are blockading the straight. What’s wrong with this guy

This is 100% ai

Do you think we can trick him into taxing churches

On the one hand software freedom.

On the other this has me thinking about how fascinating this problem is from academic standpoint.

How can you ensure software can ONLY run on the machines you allow? Even if the user has ring 0 access?

Is it mathematically impossible to achieve?

Any question that you could get the answer too from reading a sentence or two from a book or article is generally an LLM will probably be able to answer.

It’s good for surface level exploratory research.

The deeper you go the more fallacies and bias start to enter the mix. LLMs by nature are biased and will only present you with one or two solutions/options/opinions on why and what.

Knowing when your hitting that point is difficult. I urge you to read documentation and human written guides and articles once you find yourself surprising what the LLM can give you.

As a software developer and script writer myself I can guarantee you what a LLM writes is not “gold” it’s more like bronze at best.