You’re wrong. I’ve been reading/listening to Novara every day for over five years. They are left wing in opinion, and 100% factual in their reporting. They are more responsible about correcting errors than the BBC or the Guardian. As the other response, I would have ditched them at any point if I found them to be dishonest.

Alright, Avery Brundage.

“geopolitical expert” it says. Here’s his Google scholar page. Seems legit. I mean I guess he is still “a guy on twitter”, in that he has a Twitter account

They got the information from someone who was raped by a dog. It says in the article.

One source appears to be the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights. It says in the article.

I haven’t gone that far yet, I always imagined a cordoned-off area of safety. I’m just now realising how stupid I was. I hope you all make it. 🫶

Solution, get you a girl that’s messier than you. My house is a shit hole, but we are still in love.

“New” data. The old data convinced me just fine

Are you certain that there is a claim that the company responsible for the tripping robot put this out as a piece of publicity?
Because if not, if it was a leak, or taken by someone not affiliated, then it would make sense it’s on the internet.

Or, are you arguing that because there exists a robot which can run reliably at 10 m s^-1, that this one shouldn’t exist?
Because my car goes 0-60 slower than a McMurtry Speirling, and yet it exists.