It isn’t and this is the one of many replies in which you haven’t provided even a single example.

This is because you can’t provide something that doesn’t exist.

Even if your reading comprehension was at such a level as to genuinely think there was an example of what you are saying in that text, you’d provide it.

I can’t see a scenario where you aren’t trolling for engagement.

I expect some personal attacks, continued feigned ignorance, perhaps some bargain basement deflection , all very standard and boring and that’s OK, if that’s your skill ceiling i won’t hold it against you.

But… i’m willing to be surprised if you have something novel, perhaps some obscure fallacy I’ll have to look up, something that sets you apart from the basement dweller trolls, something noteworthy, perhaps enough to get you elevated to troll management?

You got this, i believe in you.

Also, i’ll save you some time , a reply that doesn’t contain a quotable example of what you’ve claimed will just be ignored, no more engagement for you.

citation?

A single example is fine, i can’t find any, but perhaps i’m missing something important.

Cauterisation with extremely hot metal works to seal a wound (and as far as upfront costs go, is cheaper).

Doesn’t mean modern medical care isn’t the preference.

smug prick.

I was going for sarcasm, but i can see the interpretational difference.

I suppose game recognises game.

“On this site, they are one and the same.” sounds like something a condescending, smug prick might say as an opener.

but by all means, tell me more about what everyone on this public forum thinks.

You mean to say that people on this site are claiming that individuals with publicly stated agendas and goals might possibly use the fiscal and/or reputational benefits of the organisations they control to aid in the furthering of whatever goals/agendas they may have?

Point me in their direction, i shall have words…big ones…like wherewithal …or extrapolation…prestidigitation…etc.

Clearly these people are buttering their toast with a teaspoon, seems like an incredible leap to me and i bet they couldn’t even provide a single example of this happening in the modern day…illogical plebeians.

Edit : more salt that I’d expect for zero actual counterpoints

I see what you mean and for jobs where deceit isn’t an asset it’s probably not a great idea to get caught lying.

I will say though, having been employed, the ability to “gracefully massage” the truth is an invaluable skill in a lot of workplaces.

Cheating is absolutely a sellable skill.