nomad

Do people not know anymore who Curt Cobain was or how he died?

“Hysteria”, who remembers the treatment? ;)

Berlin Congress center is a dead giveaway. I think

I prefer Gemma 4. Does what I need. Obviously there are quite a few problems. But democratization of technology is starting to catch up.

Berlin Alexanderplatz metro station?

Depending on how similar our physiology is, a lot of very contagious infections like when we entered the Americas.

Assuming the intent is meeting and not conquer or eradicate, because if we meet them they are certainly more advanced in technology than us.

Probably looking for similarities in communication and maybe some kind of high security hosting behavior.

After communication has been established, hopefully diplomatic ties are established.

Its not the tool that is evil, but the intent its used with. That’s all I’m gonna say on that topic.

I agree people turn a blind eye to a breakthrough just to be left behind when its used against them. Inform yourself so you can be an informed member of society.

i know the author personally. We went to the same university for IT security. His skills are undeniable. Ignoring a legitimately working tool that finds legitimate security problems is just asking for trouble. For all its flaws there are some legitimate uses of LLMs and this is one of them.

maintainers of critical Software can’t afford to be that ignorant.

You are probably talking about scraping a website. There are usually tools for this already that make that easy. Last time I had to do something like that I used scrapy.

These look like a kids feet. Which would explain some of the behavior. Also why those don’t look that worn yet.

You only need the reboot if a package update masks the retirement.

The system is not lying to you, it holds some critical updates back to be installed separately and manually.

The output shows you which packages have been held back. Just do apt-get install linux-image-amd64 for example, reboot and apt autoremove to remove the old kernel.

I had decided not to comment on this again as crowds are usually somewhat ignorant.

The error in my assumption is that all parents would handle this with care. My kids would usually come to me or my wife with things like this.

But I would be wrong in this assumption it seems. Especially with outliers around kids with psychological problems that are usually caused or acerbated by their parents.

If I would somehow overlook something I would love to be able to rely on the school to inform me. I can however see, that that might be in the range of decisions a capable educator should be able to decide themselves. I certainly chose a good school for my kids and know they would handle that well.

I must admit i imagined my kids in the hands of the American educational system which terrified me just a little more.

So these down votes are somewhat my fault but then again I have loving parents and care about my children and the down votes don’t bother me more than maybe thinking on the issue one more time.

So thank you for your plentiful comments. :)

How is it that you need to post that under a totally unrelated comment? Insert vegan meme here that has not told anybody for three hours.

Counter to intuition this is actually a good thing. Not that they do good things… But it causes monopolies like the OPEC to fracture so some countries can pump more oil now due to increasing prices.

Also I suggest you read “the prince” by Machiavelli.

Sounds good. We have a matrix server, let’s get together there when we can. :) I started as a sysadmin and with Linux and then went to do security for a while and got into professional software development and keeping the software available and working in 2014. Haven’t stopped since. We developed our first own product last year and will begin selling this year. :)

Interesting perspective, thank you. Also a well balanced take on the matter. Doubly thank you ;)

I don’t own my kids but I certainly named them and for some years I’m the only one allowed to change that.

The school is usually required to inform parents about significant information regarding their schooling and mental health as well. In my opinion my kid changing their name and or gender is something I would want to know about.

Significant changes like this need to be discussed in depth, which is not to say they shouldn’t do it, just that I would like to discuss that and up to a certain age this health decision is up to his parents either way.

Can’t disclose the page here as to not dox myself. But I run and own a software systems company in Germany. We do software development and operate the software for the customer on Linux based servers reliability guarantees and high availability setups. I and several employees have also an academic background in IT security. :) what do you do?

You’re asserting certainty where the facts are actually contested, and that’s the core problem.

1. Haavara ≠ “alliance with Nazis” The Haavara Agreement was a limited, controversial arrangement to get some Jews out of Nazi Germany with part of their assets. It wasn’t ideological alignment or a “Zionist–Nazi alliance.” Reducing it to that ignores the context: people trying to escape persecution with very few options.

2. Refuge elsewhere wasn’t realistically available Before and after the war, large-scale refuge largely did not materialize. The Évian Conference is a clear example—many countries expressed sympathy but refused to take in significant numbers. After the war, millions were displaced and many survivors had no homes or communities left to return to.

3. Nakba is real—but “genocide since founding” is not a settled legal fact The Nakba involved expulsions and flight on a massive scale—serious and well-documented. But calling Israel’s entire existence “genocide” is a legal claim that is actively disputed, including under the United Nations Genocide Convention. You can argue it—but you can’t present it as uncontested fact.

4. “Ethnostate = genocide” is not how the term works Many states define themselves in ethnic or national terms. That alone doesn’t meet the legal threshold for genocide, which requires intent to destroy a group. Conflating these weakens your argument.

5. Wars in the region aren’t one-sided The Arab–Israeli War of 1948 involved multiple states and actors. Israel has initiated some actions; so have others. Claiming everything is unilateral aggression isn’t supported by the historical record.

6. Nazi comparison breaks under scrutiny Invoking Nazi Germany doesn’t clarify anything. It’s rhetorically strong but analytically weak, because the structures, scale, and intent are not equivalent.

There are serious, evidence-based criticisms of Israeli policy—settlements, civilian harm, occupation. Those stand on their own. But when everything is framed as “objectively genocide, no debate,” you’re not strengthening the case—you’re stepping outside what can actually be demonstrated and defended.