Music doesn’t stay under copywrite, forever. You could use anything that’s aged out of copywrite, too. And then you, as a business won’t alienate people who choose not to consume ai for ethical reasons.

It’s not us, it’s not as we thing. It’s a handful of assholes who have lost their humanity, driving us. For instance, back when they were trying to colonise Australia, they needed a heap of bodies over there to do the manual labour side of it, so they made everything illegal and no way to survive without doing illegal things, for a massive subsection of people, bam they had a workforce, sent in chains, to serve their purposes. Now they use propaganda to enlist the people to support their self serving causes, etc. Join movements to divest and boycott the elite, and you will be working towards building the future you want to see.

Is this a reverse play? Does that ruling leave open the door to similar rulings against llms? Why did they offer no contest at all?

Instead of thinking of people in two groups, dumb normies and the group you are in, why not try thinking of them as, in the know and not yet in the know. For instance, there was a time when you weren’t in the know about Proton.me, and someone explained it to you, because that’s the way we make big changes in the world, by gathering numbers. The more people that we can get on the, in the know, side, the more power in our numbers we can use.

So, when you find someone who doesn’t know, sell the thing to them with a couple of well worded sentences. Things like, if you really care about your privacy, you use applications that are privacy friendly, for now. Like…fill in blanks.

If you can’t think what to say, ask yourself why you use it.