@dessalines@lemmy.ml being as sharp as always, thank you for sharing this! I somehow missed that essay in the past, and recently even had a discussion where I argued in favor of signal. His overview makes some great points that shouldn’t be dismissed offhandedly. The important point is to not make the mistake of shunning signal in favor of an even less secure alternative. Also the user’s threat model should be taken into account. Those who aren’t anticapitalists (yet) might need to worry less about the concerns.
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 27 days ago
Cake day: March 30th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Hmm, this is a topic that has been debated for years, I guess instead of writing my own summaries, it’s great to link you to some resources, outlining why modern AI (“LLM”/“GPT”) is controversial:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model#Safety
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model#Societal_concerns
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#Limitations
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_slop
Note that some issues apply only given certain output (e.g. hallucinations), some depend on the usage (the decision to generate and publicize AI slop is made by human operators), whereas some issues are always present (e.g. huge environmental impact).
Regarding the there being a difference between good and bad AI or not: Some people argue that it’s always bad, some are bit more nuanced, some are competely blind/ignorant to the problem. Only those in the middle camp would necessarily see a difference.
11·7 days ago“This game doesn’t look like other games you’ve played in the past” pfft yeah sure, who are you trying to fool? 😘
It wouldn’t surprise me if both are just happy to gave enjoyed each other’s show