• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    giant corporation lies it’s ass off and pollutes and destroys the world so the CEO and shareholders get a few extra dollars, all without consequences

    You don’t say!

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The recycling movement really ruined any attempt at the federal government regulating/limiting plastic production. Which I have to assume was the purpose.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      the recycling movement is, ultimately, a big giant scam designed to shove the burden off onto consumers instead of on the producers.

      and most everything but easy and valuable metals still end up more in dumps than being reprocessed in any way, because processing/sorting waste plastic is hard and no one wants to pay the money to do it… So if they suspect one wrong plastic in an entire truckload of plastic recyclables, the entire truck goes to the dump.

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Plastic recycling basically everywhere is a scam. It requires direct government subsidization to be cost competitive with new plastic. Companies actually advertising that they do it or could do it are missing the forest for the trees or just greenwashing.

    Because plastic is a byproduct of oil production. It is a way to get rid of fractions of oil that are not used as fuel. No matter how efficient plastic recycling gets, it will never be cost competitive with new plastic. Refineries will just drop the price of the new plastic to ensure all of it gets sold, since if they couldn’t sell it, they would have to pay to dispose of it.

    The real value of plastics isn’t that they’re good materials for things, it’s that they’re a way for oil companies to push the responsibility of disposing of their waste products on to public waste management by laundering it through packaging and cheap junk.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      Because plastic is a byproduct of oil production.

      I learned this from playing Satisfactory. I mean, I probably actually learned it in school at some point, but Satisfactory really drove it home. One of the first things you learn after unlocking oil is how to process all the excess oil by-product into plastic… And then straight into the shredder for those sweet sweet Ficsit coupons

    • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Another side of the issue is that recycling is not government mandated - companies can choose on their own to recycle, and this is costly. When we as a society expect companies to maximize profit, it can come as no surprise that they do not voluntarily pay to be ecologically responsible.

    • capital_sniff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This sounds like cardboard propaganda. When everyone knows cardboard is just a way for lumber companies to dispose of their unused tree parts from 2x4 production.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    giant corporation lies it’s ass off and pollutes and destroys the world so the CEO and shareholders get a few extra dollars, all without consequences

    You don’t say!

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Allow me to rephrase Starbucks’ claim: “the plastic we said was recyclable decades ago but then found to be prohibitively expensive to recycle, information that didn’t change our practice at all, is now considered recyclable again and wevre taking credit and celebrating but still pawning the task off on whoever takes our garbage”

    Polypropylene is #5, which nearly all takeout containers are made form in my experience. My town hasn’t taken any plastic besides 1/2/3 for at least a decade.

    1: polyethylene, such as soda bottles
    2: high density polyethylene, such as milk jugs (and a pretty good material for flat bearings)
    3: pvc, such as medicine bottles
    4: low density polyethylene, such as bags
    5: polypropylene, such as most food takeout containers

    • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      In my opinion, companies should be required to recycle and penalized if they don’t. This word salad of talking about how things are possible is meaningless if it isn’t done.

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Some plastic water cups and takeaway containers are 1, but most of them are 5 or 6, in my recent experience.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Starbucks is a shit company and people need to stop drinking their slop.

    If there’s a local coffee house nearby (there almost always is) then go there instead.

  • KraeuterRoy@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    ‘Recyclable’ just means that you - theoretically - CAN recycle something. Doesn’t mean that it’s actually done - and never has.

    That word has always been the most blatant dogwhistle of greenwashing.

  • Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That means they aren’t very valuable even in recycling. Starbucks would not ignore a potentially reliable revenue stream.

    • evenglow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Recycling used to be shipped to China. A couple of years ago China made that illegal.

      • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        That’s fair. It’s more than a little disgusting to imagine one country exporting its literal waste to an entirely separate group of people… Countries should have to manage their own trash. But there’s a lot that countries should have to do that will never be done, so ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The scammers are those who say they recycle but don’t. That isn’t recycling itself.

      • mysticpickle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Recycling of plastics only happens when it’s economically feasible to do so. Otherwise it just ends up in the landfill. More than 90% of plastics end up there

        The whole concept of most plastics being economically feasible to recycle, by plastering a recycling symbol on every single type of plastic product, is a facade created by the plastics industry to stem the growing backlash against plastic waste that started all the way back in the 1970s

        https://grist.org/culture/recycling-symbol-logo-plastic-design/

        • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          facade created by the plastics industry

          Exactly, instead of satisfying the actual demand for actual recycling, the plastics industry is scamming people by filling up landfills. The customers will pay for environmental damages down the line, instead of upfront for recycling, which is not what they necessarily want. The scammers are making that decision for them without their consent, by making them believe they’re paying for recycling, while they are actually NOT receiving that service.