• lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    So are drag races and monster truck rallies. Big and fast machines attract and fascinate mostly men.

    • kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      …which aren’t (usually) paid for with taxpayer dollars

      But I’m guessing doing air shows counts towards training hours, so they’re going to be flying those planes regardless. Still feels like a massive waste when two of them crash and burn in a show though

      • Dultas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure it does. Flyovers at ballgames etc do so I don’t see why airshows wouldn’t.

            • Art3mis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Thats not a showcase of cool planes. Like a train convention but for cargo planes and jumbo jets and cool prop planes

            • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              As someone who doesn’t attend them anymore, I think most of the fun in an air show ALSO involves the ground stuff. As a kid I actually touched and sat in a few planes.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s definitely not true. Maybe it is in the US, but seeing machines go fast or tackle complex challenges isn’t a gender-specific thing. For example, 42% of Formula 1 fans are female. Plenty of women spectating and competing at drag strips, land speed, rally, etc.

      The old conservative culture of assuming things of people or pigeonholing them based on gender—like, “attract and fascinate mostly men”—is not as relevant as it used to be back in the old days, nor should it be preserved.

        • SailorFuzz@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          you’re just be pedantic. The issue isn’t about it being “mostly”, it’s about if its a “men’s” thing. A 42/58 isn’t that wide of a gap to say that it’s one gender’s thing. As the difference could likely just be attributed to other cultural factors and not the thing itself.

          If office workers were split 42/58, you wouldn’t call it a “man’s” job, even if technically there’s more men.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Nevertheless, if you want to say it’s not “mostly,” your example ought to do better than 42%!

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Only if it’s young dudes playing. Conservative men also love movies where it’s mostly just young dudes (like that 300 movie where the cast is all handsome young dudes in leather panties being led by an older middle aged dude) They really seem to prefer young dudes in general I guess.