• Tim@lemmy.snowgoons.ro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I hope you’re right. I 100% respect your right to want a phone with a replaceable battery; but I equally absolutely want the slimmest phone possible and really really don’t want the compromises that a user-replaceable battery calls for.

    Both are valid choices, and that clause would seem a good way of ensuring both are provided for.

    • detren@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just fyi the law doesn’t make the batteries replaceable like on old phones, where you had to pop the entire back off, but just reasonably replaceable, meaning an end user with normalish tools (they don’t specify which afaik) should be able to open it. I imagine we will see thin designs like the iPhone Air where all the non-replaceable parts are in a plateau and the battery is easily reachable with a bunch of screws and maybe some prying. At least that’s what I hope for.