alt text

An edit of xkcd 2501, “Average Familiarity”:
[Ponytail and Cueball are talking. Ponytail has her hand raised, palm up, towards Cueball.]
Ponytail: Open-source alternatives are second nature to us foss nerds, so it’s easy to forget that the average person probably only knows Linux and one or two degoogled Android ROMs.
Cueball: And Firefox, of course.
Ponytail: Of course.

[Caption below the panel]
Even when they’re trying to compensate for it, experts in anything wildly overestimate the average person’s familiarity with their field.

partly inspired by the replies to this post but i see this kind of thing all the time (shoutout to the person who once genuinely asked “who still uses google these days?”)

made with this neat tool

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The “Dunning-Kruger” effect directly contradicts this. It states that experts will overestimate the lay-person’s knowledge. (it’s the second, and often forgotten result)

    I’m not saying either is correct, there are plenty of reasons to doubt Dunning-Kruger including that it’s results are among the “reproduceability crisis” in Psychological research.

    edit: yea I misunderstood that.

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        tbh, i realize that me using “condescending” in the title kinda implies that experts would underestimate, that’s usually what that word means

        is there a better word for this? i meant it in the sense of foss nerds being all “if you still use google chrome in 2026 you’re an idiot and deserve what happens to you” to people