mudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 days agoSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square17linkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 days agomessage-square17linkfedilink
minus-squaregrranibal@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·18 days agoI’d say EQ (emotional) is more useful on a daily basis
minus-squareturdas@suppo.filinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·18 days agoMaybe, but I don’t know if that’s a good thing. Social intelligence is how CEOs and other charlatans get disproportionate success in society, and if all we had was social intelligence humanity would be nothing but smooth-talking cavemen.
minus-squarehayvan@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoIf we all had emotional intelligence, we’d be good at seeing through the shit of smooth-talking cavemen.
I’d say EQ (emotional) is more useful on a daily basis
Maybe, but I don’t know if that’s a good thing. Social intelligence is how CEOs and other charlatans get disproportionate success in society, and if all we had was social intelligence humanity would be nothing but smooth-talking cavemen.
If we all had emotional intelligence, we’d be good at seeing through the shit of smooth-talking cavemen.
Good point.