The Minnesota state Senate has approved a sweeping violence prevention bill taken up after a violent year that saw the shooting deaths of two Minneapolis schoolchildren and the assassination of House DFL Leader Melissa Hortman and her husband.
The wide-ranging bill includes a ban on assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines, expanded requirements for the safe storage of firearms, and more funding for school security and mental health care.
“Today is really, really historic,” said Sen. Ron Latz, DFL-St. Louis Park, a long-time advocate of gun control legislation at the Capitol. “It stands on the work of the legislators that came before us.”
The bill cleared the Democrat-controlled Senate by a single vote, 34 to 33, with all Democrats voting for the bill and all Republicans voting against. It also marks a rare bright spot for DFL Gov. Tim Walz, who threw his energy into violence prevention efforts after the shooting at Annunciation Catholic Church and School in August, only to see Republicans rebuff him and his influence wane in his administration’s final year.
Republicans will also almost certainly block the measure’s most controversial provisions in the tied House, where they control the speaker’s gavel. Even attempts to address less contentious policy points, like school security and mental health care, have stalled in the House.
“I’m very excited today that there’s some really good work being done around gun safety,” Walz told reporters this morning before the vote. “But I’m also a realist.”
A spokeswoman for GOP House Speaker Lisa Demuth did not immediately provide comment on the Senate bill’s passage. Demuth has previously expressed skepticism about the gun control measures pushed by Democrats.
“This is not going to bring these kids back and that’s all these families want,” she told the Minnesota Star Tribune last month.
How long before the Supreme Court rules this unconstitutional? I fucking hate this country and it’s love for guns.
Probably as fast as a lawsuit can be filed.
I’m not anti-guns. I’m pro-responsible ownership and reasonable restrictions. I don’t hate 2A until it becomes the excuse that we can’t fix anything.
I would suggest to 2A advocates that they become a bit less dogmatic in their “anything goes” interpretation. Because if 2A is a check on unreasonable regulation, that’s fine. But if it prevents reasonable gun control laws, then it has to be repealed. Not that repealing it is going to happen any time soon, but we continue to build up Supreme Court decisions that prove 2A is broken and must go. Someday, all of these reasonable laws being struck down will be the justification for repeal. And they will be correct.