• faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It probably is fucked up. But if you know the consequences of getting caught, why would you risk it? If freedom to do drugs is important either be in a jurisdiction that is lenient.

    I mean you can try to change the laws and try to protest and get political change, but that wouldn’t leave you much off in Singapore’s authoritarian air.

    So the question is, was the hit of recreational drug that important to take the risk?

    I’m not saying what or what shouldn’t be, I’m just saying knowing you know what IS, why would you? It’s like you know lava is hot, but you step in it anyway because it should be a morally a volcanic rock.

    • MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      was the hit of recreational drug that important to take the risk

      He didn’t get executed for taking a “hit”.

      He got executed for trafficking a kilo.

      Which is still pretty stupid, because 500 grams is the cutoff for the death penalty. He would have been better off to bring in 499 grams. But I assume he was going to make a pretty good profit, and that money was his main motivation.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The guy was an idiot. Doesn’t change the fact that Singaporean authoritarianism is fucked up. Being an idiot shouldn’t be a death sentence.