wdym “terrible quality loss”; for one their lossless beats PNG
This depends, if your image contains a lot of flat colours (like a screenshot of a website) then PNG can actually give you smaller file sizes than lossless webp. But for most images (especially ones with compression artefacts) lossless webp gives smaller sizes.
But that’s not got anything to do with quality. That’s compression size
Lossless encoding, by definition, won’t have any quality loss.
Watch some startup “invent” a revolutionary lossless format that discards some information.
They had a better joke, but they converted it to a Webp and lost the punchline.
webp is a fine format, blame the websites that disallow webp upload, but then proceed to convert the image to webp anyway
Cloudflare zero trust apps allow webp images on initial creation, then arbitrarily disallow webp on edit. You can’t edit until you replace the image you already uploaded, and the system accepted.
< Insert XKCD comic strip about new standards here >
