• cybernihongo@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just because a capitalist US corporation is “not public” you figure they’re not chasing next quarter? Really?

    • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Also, are you going to deny the role Valve has played in helping propel Linux toward mainstream desktop use? They’ve dramatically changed the game (pun intended) in terms of compatibility, and everyone gets to benefit. That’s a good thing, right?

    • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They’re not beholden to shareholders concerned with nothing more than the near-future value of stock. So they’re more likely to actually give a shit about their long-term viability, the value of their product, and the opinion of their customers, rather than the whims of Wall Street.

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I mean, public companies have to chase the quarter, private companies don’t have to. Private is a curse and a blessing. It can be better because the ownership might be reasonable, or it could be worse because the owners are insane.

      Public is predictable, for good and for ill. Private is a a wild card.

      The only safe bet is worker owned.

      • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        And private companies still exist in and play by the rules of a capitalist system, yes. A system that encourages being unethical and chasing profits. So you bet worker-owned is the best bet. That or a lot of regulation, which the US is deliberately lacking.

        So yeah as a Linux user I’m not putting 1% of my faith in a US corporation.