• Telemachus93@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      The report is linked in the article. It’s an annual report of the Secretary General to the Security Council.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      There isn’t really anything stopping them from doing it, just like the us bombing people in boats, its not legal, but who’s gonna stop them?

      • 0x0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Since its a UN list, it is literally just a list, no penalty, just a naughty list.

        • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah. It seems to be a list rather than a blacklist. But because it names and shames it makes it easier for public sentiment to change and maybe some on-the-fence parties to come off it. It’s breadcrumbs, but I’ll take it.

    • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      I assume it means that they lose some privileges or they can’t send troops to be part of UN forces. Also, I’ve heard little of Russian war crimes, to the extent there are any.

      Israel in the other hand has publicly admitted to systemic sexual abuse of prisoners, including using dogs to carry out rapes.

      • Amanda@aggregatet.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s listed in the article if you read it, and I’ve seen multiple reports. There are also credible reports of other human rights violations around the invasion of Ukraine. I don’t know whose water you’re carrying here or if this is some campist crap.