The US government may only revoke passports for reasons of national security. Someone being behind on bills does not meet that criteria. See Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/453/280/

https://commons.law.famu.edu/faculty-research/155/

"In Haig v. Agee, the United States Supreme Court held that the Secretary of State has the authority to revoke a passport when the bearer’s activities abroad “**are causing or are likely to cause serious damage to the national security or the foreign policy of the United States.” **

Thats how American police treat a 62 year old woman in a costume.

Hakeem is probably going to write a mildly aggressive tweet.

“Tax the rich” is the 99% being nice. We could go the France in 1792 route.

I haven’t used a Microsoft browser or operating syatem in almost 25 years.

Whenever I hear the “only people with something to hide” comment I reply “oh? Then unlock your phone, hand it to me and leave the room.” They always backtrack immediately.

This is what happens when you elect morons to legislate technology they dont understand.

There are 137 related articles though. Thats incredibly informative.